Resolving Decordant PA Results between SharpCap and Other Methods?
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2026 1:16 pm
Hello! I'm getting consistent results with Sharpcap, but these differ from PHD2 Guiding Assistant and NINA's 3 point Polar alignment. During a recent trial, Sharpcap gave an error of 10 arc-sec after polar alignment, while PHD2 GA gave 35 arc-min and NINA gave 55 arc-min. PHD2 and NINA also give consistent results between PA runs.
I have an 8" LX200 OTA on a Ioptron HEM44 with a counterbalance. I use an SBIG ST402 camera with a focal reducer on the main scope giving 12x20 arc-min FOV. I use a 100mm f2.8 camera lens with QHY5III678M for the guider. NINA 3PPA was performed with the main scope; PHD2 and Sharpcap with the guide scope (I used a subframe of 1.5 degrees for Sharpcap - no problems with plate solving.)
I'm at a loss to explain the different PA errors with the different methods, and I would appreciate guidance on how to resolve the discrepancy. Thank you and best regards.
Mike
I have an 8" LX200 OTA on a Ioptron HEM44 with a counterbalance. I use an SBIG ST402 camera with a focal reducer on the main scope giving 12x20 arc-min FOV. I use a 100mm f2.8 camera lens with QHY5III678M for the guider. NINA 3PPA was performed with the main scope; PHD2 and Sharpcap with the guide scope (I used a subframe of 1.5 degrees for Sharpcap - no problems with plate solving.)
I'm at a loss to explain the different PA errors with the different methods, and I would appreciate guidance on how to resolve the discrepancy. Thank you and best regards.
Mike