The white balance
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2022 12:47 pm
I always use 50/50 because it works, it's easier to make darks (it's a round value) but mostly because i once read Robin making reference to the power of the ZWO 294MC being at it's high when using the 50/50. And i trust Robin.
I don't understand the deepest technical nuances of a camera but what i interpreted has to be with the pixels and the distribution within them that works better with the 50/50 ALTHOUGH boosting the green tint and therefore, increasing those values will return a natural color on the screen.
From that, i understood Robin preference for that 50/50 as a way to use the full power and later, in the post process, adjust to more natural colors.
My dilemma is that i'm centered on EAA, therefore, live stacking is my main purpose. And i get the greenish tint BUT then i adjust the histogram to get the natural colors. So the darks and the live stack work at 50/50.
Robin, can you explain in a simple way the advantages i have keeping using the 50/50 live stacking with the ZWO 294MC or do you recommend to change the way i'm doing things with the white balance?
Thanks
I don't understand the deepest technical nuances of a camera but what i interpreted has to be with the pixels and the distribution within them that works better with the 50/50 ALTHOUGH boosting the green tint and therefore, increasing those values will return a natural color on the screen.
From that, i understood Robin preference for that 50/50 as a way to use the full power and later, in the post process, adjust to more natural colors.
My dilemma is that i'm centered on EAA, therefore, live stacking is my main purpose. And i get the greenish tint BUT then i adjust the histogram to get the natural colors. So the darks and the live stack work at 50/50.
Robin, can you explain in a simple way the advantages i have keeping using the 50/50 live stacking with the ZWO 294MC or do you recommend to change the way i'm doing things with the white balance?
Thanks