thanks for adding the non-stacked pixels values to the logs - it can make interesting viewing
However, I notice an apparent error in the case snipped below, where a frame isn't stacked - the values logged for rejected pixels are those from the previous successful frame, rather than 100% or similar
Code: Select all
00:22:59 INFO 0.6850% of pixels (414706) not stacked due to sigma limits
00:26:59 INFO Detected 113 in the stacked image, mean FWHM is 5.245321
00:26:59 INFO Detected 123 stars in the frame image, mean FWHM is 4.853202
00:26:59 INFO Calculated Transform : dx=0.9, dy=-37.5, angle=0.0, scale=1.0000
00:27:00 INFO 0.8143% of pixels (493003) not stacked due to sigma limits
00:30:59 INFO Detected 113 in the stacked image, mean FWHM is 5.230245
00:31:00 INFO Detected 54 stars in the frame image, mean FWHM is 8.148914
00:31:00 INFO Calculated Transform : dx=0.8, dy=-45.1, angle=0.0, scale=1.0000
00:31:00 INFO Frame discarded due to filter conditions.
00:31:00 WARN Frame not stacked because : FWHM too high
00:31:00 INFO 0.8143% of pixels (493003) not stacked due to sigma limits
Carl
