Deconvolving the Eskimo nebula NGC2392
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2022 9:31 pm
VX12 Orion Optics (UK) Newtonian (f = 1200mm, F4.0), SW parracor type coma corrector, CEM70 Ioptron mount, Baader steeltrack focuser, Pegasus Cube2 focus controller, PHD2 guiding using an ASI 120 mm guide camera and 80 mm SW startravel refractor at f = 400 mm.
OSC image was 7 x 20s plus 100 x 5s exposures at gain 124 using an ASI 294MC camera - pixel size 4.63 uM
Mono image was 213 x 3s at gain 285 using an ASI 294MM camera - pixel size 2.315 uM
Bortle 6 moonless skies
Again the idea here was to take the OSC image and to try and sharpen it up by 1) substituting in the luminance from slightly sharper 3s mono frames and 2) doing the same but using a deconvolved 3s mono image.
The image on the left is the original OSC image, the central image is after addition of 3s image luminance and the one on the right is the same but after first deconvolving the mono image.
On this occasion the linear integrated mono 3s image was not especially sharp (FWHM ~ 2.25) and barely any better than the (also short frame) OSC image (FWHM ~ 2.4) . Not surprisingly, by itself, the addition of the mono luminacne resulted in only a correspondingly slight improvement. However deconvolution worked well to sharpen the image and made a big difference.
This type of bright high SNR and also detailed object is probably the ideal subject for deconvolution the success of which process is highly dependent upon and limited by noise. I attach a link to an interesting reference on deconvolution - and how it is used professionally alongside adaptive optics. Not pretending to understand all the math but sort of get it as an iterative fourier transform -- wavelet adjustment according to the (measured) image point spread function - and then fourier synthesis process ?? https://cfao.ucolick.org/aosummer/book/ ... _tyler.pdf
Anyway it still rather looks like magic to me - something for nothing -- or rather like seeing an out of focus image snap into focus.
I look forward to doing this target 'properly' sometime starting from some much better short frames ...
Tim
OSC image was 7 x 20s plus 100 x 5s exposures at gain 124 using an ASI 294MC camera - pixel size 4.63 uM
Mono image was 213 x 3s at gain 285 using an ASI 294MM camera - pixel size 2.315 uM
Bortle 6 moonless skies
Again the idea here was to take the OSC image and to try and sharpen it up by 1) substituting in the luminance from slightly sharper 3s mono frames and 2) doing the same but using a deconvolved 3s mono image.
The image on the left is the original OSC image, the central image is after addition of 3s image luminance and the one on the right is the same but after first deconvolving the mono image.
On this occasion the linear integrated mono 3s image was not especially sharp (FWHM ~ 2.25) and barely any better than the (also short frame) OSC image (FWHM ~ 2.4) . Not surprisingly, by itself, the addition of the mono luminacne resulted in only a correspondingly slight improvement. However deconvolution worked well to sharpen the image and made a big difference.
This type of bright high SNR and also detailed object is probably the ideal subject for deconvolution the success of which process is highly dependent upon and limited by noise. I attach a link to an interesting reference on deconvolution - and how it is used professionally alongside adaptive optics. Not pretending to understand all the math but sort of get it as an iterative fourier transform -- wavelet adjustment according to the (measured) image point spread function - and then fourier synthesis process ?? https://cfao.ucolick.org/aosummer/book/ ... _tyler.pdf
Anyway it still rather looks like magic to me - something for nothing -- or rather like seeing an out of focus image snap into focus.
I look forward to doing this target 'properly' sometime starting from some much better short frames ...
Tim