Hi Robinadmin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 2:04 pm Hi Alberto,
I think the problem is that until you have completed the initial alignment process (selecting the two stars, centering them, confirming on the handset, etc), the co-ordinates that SharpCap receives from the mount may not be correct, which could throw off the plate solving process. Normally plate solving is used to properly center a target after the initial alignment is complete, I'm not aware of people using it in the way you are planning.
cheers,
Robin
I have been reflecting on your point
I suppose that alignment is needed to map the sky
However suppose you want to center and track one only celestial object per time
Sharpcap asks the user for the coords of his target
the mount is initially in its home position then it slews to the target
from the snapshot you can obtain the final position of the scope
even though you use magnetic compass and bubble the error should not be higher than 15°
you plate solve to center the object
the path of the star is known so tracking should not be an issue
as far as I see a possible drawback vs traditional 2 or 3 stars alignment is the following :
If you want to track an other celestail object you must repeat the procedure from the beginning ( home postition etc )