Sequencer indicating Object below horizon when it is near Zenith
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:12 pm
Hi all,
some nights ago I was trying to get started with the new sequencing tool in v4. Mount (iOptron CEM-60), Cam, Focuser, all is connecting flawless through ASCOM. But when I try to plan a session with the Sequence Planner the comment behind the object of desire is indicating that it is below horizon (while it definitely is close to Zenith). Because of this mismatch I have no chance to point to an object and at that point I had to stop my first tries.
I am using other sequencing tools like SGP and NINA without any issues on a regular basis – never experienced this problem before. And I checked all settings in SC, I found nothing to fix this issue by myself.
Currently I have no screenshot nor the exact SC version I was using (should be .7906) since I am not in my observatory and have access to that computer. But I assume that my issue is well known and easy to fix. In case it is not a super-obvious noob mistake of course I can hand missing information in later.
Can anyone point me to the error I do with these information already?
Clear skies,
Daniel
some nights ago I was trying to get started with the new sequencing tool in v4. Mount (iOptron CEM-60), Cam, Focuser, all is connecting flawless through ASCOM. But when I try to plan a session with the Sequence Planner the comment behind the object of desire is indicating that it is below horizon (while it definitely is close to Zenith). Because of this mismatch I have no chance to point to an object and at that point I had to stop my first tries.
I am using other sequencing tools like SGP and NINA without any issues on a regular basis – never experienced this problem before. And I checked all settings in SC, I found nothing to fix this issue by myself.
Currently I have no screenshot nor the exact SC version I was using (should be .7906) since I am not in my observatory and have access to that computer. But I assume that my issue is well known and easy to fix. In case it is not a super-obvious noob mistake of course I can hand missing information in later.
Can anyone point me to the error I do with these information already?
Clear skies,
Daniel