Planetary Stacking filename templates not correctly interpreted

A place to report problems and bugs in SharpCap
Forum rules
‍

If you have a problem or question, please check the FAQ to see if it already has an answer : https://www.sharpcap.co.uk/sharpcap-faqs

Please also read about Troubleshooting USB Issues before posting.

*** Please do not post license keys - please report any problems with licensing to 'admin' by private message ***

Please include the following details in any bug report:

* Version of SharpCap
* Camera and other hardware being user
* Operating system version
* Contents of the SharpCap log after the problem has occurred.
[If SharpCap crashes, please send the bug report when prompted instead of including the log]
Post Reply
PeterC65
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:05 pm
Location: Forest of Dean

Planetary Stacking filename templates not correctly interpreted

#1

Post by PeterC65 »

Hi Robin,

Thanks for adding the changes I had previously requested. This is mostly working now but there are still a couple of bugs in v4.2.15332.

With the Planetary Stack (Snapshot) template set to "{TargetName}\{TargetName} {Filter} {SubExposure} x{Gain} {StackedFrames}frames D{Date} T{Time}" and the Stack Length at 1000 I am getting filenames like "Jupiter Visible 50ms x100 2777frames D26_10_2026 T18_41_11" so with more than 1000 frames.

With the Planetary Stack (Timelapse) template set to "{TargetName}\Timelapse\{TargetName} {Filter} {SubExposure} x{Gain} {StackedFrames}frames D{Date} T{Time} {Extra}" and the Stack Length at 1000 and the Gain at 100 I am getting filenames like "Jupiter Visible 50ms x 2846frames D26_10_2026 T18_42_47" so again with more than 1000 frames and with the gain value missing.

Thanks again for all your hard work.

Peter
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 17510
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
Contact:

Re: Planetary Stacking filename templates not correctly interpreted

#2

Post by admin »

Hi Peter,

the frame number thing is as expected - the naming is generated from the number of frames added to the stack since it started, not the 'set number' of frames that defines the length of the stack. Think of it as the tag in the filename being something that distinguishes one file from another (if you save multiple times) based on how long the stack has been running for - it's not a way to record the set value of the equivalent number of frames in the stack (that gets saved into the capture settings file for reference).

I will check the missing gain on the timelapses - it appears on snapshots, so I suspect the data is not being passed on to the code that creates the timelapse filename.

cheers,

Robin
PeterC65
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:05 pm
Location: Forest of Dean

Re: Planetary Stacking filename templates not correctly interpreted

#3

Post by PeterC65 »

Hi Robin,

Thanks for looking into this.

I take your point about the frame number but would argue that it should reflect the number of frames stacked as it does for DSOs, so the "Stack Length" figure from the "Live Planetary Stacking/Enhancement" dialog. The forever increasing number that it currently takes can be used as a tag but so can date and time (as I do).

Is there perhaps some way to allow the "Stack Length" figure to be used as a {TagName} so that I could choose this?

Peter
Post Reply