Robin,
I've been using 4.2b exclusively for the past three months. I'm also vigilant about checking for updates and downloading them. As a one trick pony DSO user of SharpCap I'm rarely using the planetary side of the application. I've always wondered if you have statistics on your user base and how many are planetary versus DSO.
As a deep space observer I'd like to see further enhancements for 4.2 which I've shared before. As an end user with zero understanding of what's under the hood I'd like to know if improved gradient removal and star reduction are feasible enhancements or just too complex to tackle. If feasible it would be nice to know if this is something on your to-do list.
Moving on to other suggestions, for the arcsinh stretch and the softening option it would be nice if the arrow buttons made 0.1 increments versus 0.2. I've found that 0.1 is the sweet spot and have to manually type it in versus using the arrow button.
Adjusting the color in the background tab after you've color calibrated seems to be hit and miss for me. Many times the handles for each color overlap and I'm not able to easily clink on the adjust tab. And then when I do it seems like mouse movements (trackball for me) are too extreme. I'd suggested the fine adjust arrows for the histogram a while back which I use constantly and love. Is there any way to do something like this for the background adjustments?
In the more recent versions of 4.2 I've noticed that in addition to closing something (like live stacking or FWHM) does not actually close it. That is, clicking the X in the corner of the feature dialog box used to close the feature. Now it seems like it only closes the dialog box yet the feature continues to run and I need to go to the main menu to close the feature.
EDIT to add one more suggestion regarding rejection of frames with a satellite trail. Typically when a frame with a satellite trail is stacked it's quite obvious with a straight white line across the entire frame. So this suggestion is for those obvious satellite trails, not the short dim or long dim trails that you don't notice without pixel peeping. Even when I'm diligent at watching the stack and unstack the bad frames there's always one that gets past me (a bathroom break, a binocular break, etc.). Can you detect these more obvious trails at the time of acquisition and delete or not add to the stack?
Thank you,
Mike
4.2 Enhancements/Improvements for DSO Live Stacking
Forum rules
'+1' posts are welcome in this area of the forums to indicate your support for a particular feature suggestion. Suggestions that get the most +1's will be seriously considered for inclusion in future versions of SharpCap.
'+1' posts are welcome in this area of the forums to indicate your support for a particular feature suggestion. Suggestions that get the most +1's will be seriously considered for inclusion in future versions of SharpCap.
-
admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17347
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
- Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
- Contact:
Re: 4.2 Enhancements/Improvements for DSO Live Stacking
Hi Mike,
my data suggests that use of deep sky stacking is about double the user of planetary/solar system stacking - at least in the last month of data. Mind you, that ratio may change significantly when Jupiter comes back into position...
4.2 has definitely ended up having more improvements for deep sky than planetary, in part because it's hard to see at the moment what other improvements for planetary are useful/possibly. There are definitely some still for deep sky that could in theory be added.
For the star size reduction, while the new stretch options help, it would be good to be able to go further. However, the normal approach for that is to create a star mask, separate the image into 'stars' and 'starless' and then process each separately before recombining. There are a significant number of steps there that would need to work reliably without significant user interaction to make that process workable inside of SharpCap live stacking - it's something I would like to try but it is significantly too big to consider for including into the initial release of 4.2
Background subtraction is probably an easier challenge - while you can do it in the 'preprocessing' tab, there is no way to undo/adjust that once it has been applied - putting the same sort of background subtraction algorithms into the live stack processing would probably help, since you could tinker with the settings and see the results. Something to consider...
For satellite trails, you have 3 current options (of which you can use any one or any combination)...
1) 'Satellite trail removal' in the preprocessing section - this is basically what you are asking for (or close to it) - detection and removal of the trails in the individual frames before they are added to the stack. It's a bit awkward to set up (best done with previously saved FITS images in the folder monitor camera), but once adjusted can detect and mask out the worst trails
2) The 'Unstack' button to remove the most recent frame if it added a nasty trail
3) The sigma clipped stacking option (as opposed to the default stack). This is good at excluding the pixels in the satellite trail that are significantly different to the normal pixel values for that area without any user interaction. It's also significantly improved in 4.2, allowing it to remove trails in the first 10 frames and the sensitivity can be adjusted more easily (although still best done with a previous set of FITS files to allow you to tinker with the values and then repeat the same data).
Both 1) and 3) work unattended, so you have some options there.
Finally, for the minor tweaks and potential issues, I will have a look to see what can be done.
thanks for the feedback!
Robin
my data suggests that use of deep sky stacking is about double the user of planetary/solar system stacking - at least in the last month of data. Mind you, that ratio may change significantly when Jupiter comes back into position...
4.2 has definitely ended up having more improvements for deep sky than planetary, in part because it's hard to see at the moment what other improvements for planetary are useful/possibly. There are definitely some still for deep sky that could in theory be added.
For the star size reduction, while the new stretch options help, it would be good to be able to go further. However, the normal approach for that is to create a star mask, separate the image into 'stars' and 'starless' and then process each separately before recombining. There are a significant number of steps there that would need to work reliably without significant user interaction to make that process workable inside of SharpCap live stacking - it's something I would like to try but it is significantly too big to consider for including into the initial release of 4.2
Background subtraction is probably an easier challenge - while you can do it in the 'preprocessing' tab, there is no way to undo/adjust that once it has been applied - putting the same sort of background subtraction algorithms into the live stack processing would probably help, since you could tinker with the settings and see the results. Something to consider...
For satellite trails, you have 3 current options (of which you can use any one or any combination)...
1) 'Satellite trail removal' in the preprocessing section - this is basically what you are asking for (or close to it) - detection and removal of the trails in the individual frames before they are added to the stack. It's a bit awkward to set up (best done with previously saved FITS images in the folder monitor camera), but once adjusted can detect and mask out the worst trails
2) The 'Unstack' button to remove the most recent frame if it added a nasty trail
3) The sigma clipped stacking option (as opposed to the default stack). This is good at excluding the pixels in the satellite trail that are significantly different to the normal pixel values for that area without any user interaction. It's also significantly improved in 4.2, allowing it to remove trails in the first 10 frames and the sensitivity can be adjusted more easily (although still best done with a previous set of FITS files to allow you to tinker with the values and then repeat the same data).
Both 1) and 3) work unattended, so you have some options there.
Finally, for the minor tweaks and potential issues, I will have a look to see what can be done.
thanks for the feedback!
Robin
Re: 4.2 Enhancements/Improvements for DSO Live Stacking
Thanks for the dso/planetary user info. I've always been curious and figured it was 50/50, and perhaps it is during planetary season.
I'll need to play a bit more with satellite trail removal. I've been using it consistently since you introduced it but must not have it set optimally. I've never been one to save a bunch of frames to play with later and perhaps that's something I need to do. There are just so many different types of trails. I'm assuming the test frames should be gathered without sigma clipping and satellite trail removal applied.
Mike
I'll need to play a bit more with satellite trail removal. I've been using it consistently since you introduced it but must not have it set optimally. I've never been one to save a bunch of frames to play with later and perhaps that's something I need to do. There are just so many different types of trails. I'm assuming the test frames should be gathered without sigma clipping and satellite trail removal applied.
Mike