Forgive me but I'm late getting to the party.
Question about the Live Solar Imaging 'Corona Boost'.
Are the images shown taken with special Ha solar prominence filters or is it achieved using a basic common White light sun filter (with the 'sun color' box checked) ?
I may as well ask my other burning question while I'm here. I'm a 1st year newbe; been shopping ZWO cameras and was just wondering....
Would I ever need a Cooled Camera if I always use SharpCap live stacking?
Thank you.
Michael
New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 9:48 am
Re: New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
Regarding seeing proms - you need either a Ha filter or, if lucky, a Ca filter. White Light won't show any proms.AngeloM wrote: ↑Tue Aug 20, 2024 9:54 pm Forgive me but I'm late getting to the party.
Question about the Live Solar Imaging 'Corona Boost'.
Are the images shown taken with special Ha solar prominence filters or is it achieved using a basic common White light sun filter (with the 'sun color' box checked) ?
I may as well ask my other burning question while I'm here. I'm a 1st year newbe; been shopping ZWO cameras and was just wondering....
Would I ever need a Cooled Camera if I always use SharpCap live stacking?
Thank you.
Michael
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
- Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
- Contact:
Re: New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
Hi,
the images shown are taken with an H-alpha filter (Daystar Quark), which brings the brightness levels of the disk and the prominences close enough together to do this. As altocumulus says, you won't see anything in white light.
cheers,
Robin
the images shown are taken with an H-alpha filter (Daystar Quark), which brings the brightness levels of the disk and the prominences close enough together to do this. As altocumulus says, you won't see anything in white light.
cheers,
Robin
Re: New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
Do you think it would it be possible to see prominences using a standard solar filter (fitted to the end of a standard scope) together with a Halpha filter fitted to the camera?
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 9:48 am
Re: New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
Standard solar filter? Baader Film? That's still only White light.
If you mean a Ha etalon that can be attached to the end/front, then yes.
What do you mean by a Halpha filter? If one designed for deep sky, then NO. It has to be a filter designed for Ha Solar use : Lunt/Daystar
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
- Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
- Contact:
Re: New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
Hi,
sadly, that won't work either... A solar h-alpha filter has a bandwidth of about 0.1nm, but deep sky h-alpha filters are typically either 3nm or 12nm bandwidth. So, even the best deep sky filter will let through 30x more 'non h-alpha' light than a proper solar filter, drowning out the prominences in the glow of the disc.
cheers,
Robin
sadly, that won't work either... A solar h-alpha filter has a bandwidth of about 0.1nm, but deep sky h-alpha filters are typically either 3nm or 12nm bandwidth. So, even the best deep sky filter will let through 30x more 'non h-alpha' light than a proper solar filter, drowning out the prominences in the glow of the disc.
cheers,
Robin
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2024 11:12 am
Re: New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
I am using Live Solar/Luner/Planetary Stacking/Enhancement in SharpCapPro!
In previous versions (4.1.12455), when I checked the "Show unprocessed frames" checkbox, I could see the real-time image and when I moved the object in that state, I could see the position change in real-time, but in later versions, the image is not displayed properly However, in later versions, the image is not displayed properly and is only displayed as shown in the Stack image. Is this a specification?
When taking a timelapse of the sun, it is necessary to change the position of the sun that has become misaligned, and it is easier to change the position if the unprocessed frame can be checked in real time.
In previous versions (4.1.12455), when I checked the "Show unprocessed frames" checkbox, I could see the real-time image and when I moved the object in that state, I could see the position change in real-time, but in later versions, the image is not displayed properly However, in later versions, the image is not displayed properly and is only displayed as shown in the Stack image. Is this a specification?
When taking a timelapse of the sun, it is necessary to change the position of the sun that has become misaligned, and it is easier to change the position if the unprocessed frame can be checked in real time.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
- Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
- Contact:
Re: New Feature : Planetary Live Stacking
Hi,
I had a look to see what has changed, and it looks like the newer versions are now consistently showing the stabilized version of the raw frame (ie roughly aligned with the current stack) rather than the truly raw frame. In previous versions there was some randomness in whether you got the stabilized or fully raw frame, depending on what other things were enabled/active in the stacking options, so the change was to allow for consistency.
What you should notice in the recent versions is a box drawn on top of the raw frames, which indicates how far the stabilization is having to move the frame. Actually, you will typically only see a maximum of two sides of the box, since the other two will be out of view. If that box is near the edge of the frame then the alignment is still good, if it has moved a long way from the edge then you may want to adjust the mount to re-align.
Here you can see an example of the box being overlaid on the unprocessed frames, visible at the bottom and right of the image. This shows that the frame from the camera has been moved up and left to align with the stack. If the offset of the box was larger then it would be time to adjust the mount.
Hope this helps,
Robin
I had a look to see what has changed, and it looks like the newer versions are now consistently showing the stabilized version of the raw frame (ie roughly aligned with the current stack) rather than the truly raw frame. In previous versions there was some randomness in whether you got the stabilized or fully raw frame, depending on what other things were enabled/active in the stacking options, so the change was to allow for consistency.
What you should notice in the recent versions is a box drawn on top of the raw frames, which indicates how far the stabilization is having to move the frame. Actually, you will typically only see a maximum of two sides of the box, since the other two will be out of view. If that box is near the edge of the frame then the alignment is still good, if it has moved a long way from the edge then you may want to adjust the mount to re-align.
Here you can see an example of the box being overlaid on the unprocessed frames, visible at the bottom and right of the image. This shows that the frame from the camera has been moved up and left to align with the stack. If the offset of the box was larger then it would be time to adjust the mount.
Hope this helps,
Robin
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.