PA Tracking or no?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2019 4:29 pm
PA Tracking or no?
I was told that you should turn off tracking during polar alignment. Is this true? I'm using a ZWO 60 mm (focal length 280 mm) guide scope with a ASI 120 camera, which gives me a horizontal angle of view of about 1°. Without tracking, during a two second exposure, I can see the stars move. My mount is a CGEM II.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13344
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
- Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
- Contact:
Re: PA Tracking or no?
Hi,
It shouldn't matter at all. Remember that the tracking rate will rotate the mount once in 24 hours and that polar alignment it should take you a maximum of five minutes or so. In that five minutes the slow rotation of the tracking rate will really make no difference whatsoever.
Cheers, Robin
It shouldn't matter at all. Remember that the tracking rate will rotate the mount once in 24 hours and that polar alignment it should take you a maximum of five minutes or so. In that five minutes the slow rotation of the tracking rate will really make no difference whatsoever.
Cheers, Robin
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2019 4:29 pm
Re: PA Tracking or no?
Robin,
Thanks for the response. Let me push back a little and see what you think. Perhaps my thinking (or calculation) is way off here.
• Say tracking is off.
• The earth moves 15° in one hour.
• That’s 15 arc minutes in one minute,
• and 15 arc seconds in one second.
For my guide scope, one pixel covers 2.76 arc seconds, so that means a star is moving through 5.43 pixels in a second (worst-case). For a two second exposure, that’s about 11 pixels. Won’t that cause some distortion in the plate solving for one plate? And won’t it cause some distortion when you compare one plate to another one taken earlier? What am I missing here?
Thanks for the response. Let me push back a little and see what you think. Perhaps my thinking (or calculation) is way off here.
• Say tracking is off.
• The earth moves 15° in one hour.
• That’s 15 arc minutes in one minute,
• and 15 arc seconds in one second.
For my guide scope, one pixel covers 2.76 arc seconds, so that means a star is moving through 5.43 pixels in a second (worst-case). For a two second exposure, that’s about 11 pixels. Won’t that cause some distortion in the plate solving for one plate? And won’t it cause some distortion when you compare one plate to another one taken earlier? What am I missing here?
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13344
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
- Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
- Contact:
Re: PA Tracking or no?
Hi,
Those figures would apply if you are pointing at the celestial equator, but the movement rates are much much smaller near the pole. Within 5° of the pole the rate is about 11 times less and within 1° of the pole it is nearly 60 times less.
Hope this helps, Robin
Those figures would apply if you are pointing at the celestial equator, but the movement rates are much much smaller near the pole. Within 5° of the pole the rate is about 11 times less and within 1° of the pole it is nearly 60 times less.
Hope this helps, Robin