Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

A place to report problems and bugs in SharpCap
Forum rules


If you have a problem or question, please check the FAQ to see if it already has an answer : https://www.sharpcap.co.uk/sharpcap-faqs

Please also read about Troubleshooting USB Issues before posting.

*** Please do not post license keys - please report any problems with licensing to 'admin' by private message ***

Please include the following details in any bug report:

* Version of SharpCap
* Camera and other hardware being user
* Operating system version
* Contents of the SharpCap log after the problem has occurred.
[If SharpCap crashes, please send the bug report when prompted instead of including the log]
Post Reply
ChrisR Oz
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:03 am
Location: Melbourne

Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#1

Post by ChrisR Oz »

Hi Robin,

Perhaps a stretch to call this a bug. But I had trouble with plate solving last night, so I thought I'd check a few things in the daylight using the Folder Camera. It uses FITS files, which have info in the header for camera pixels and pixel size, as well as RA (OBJCTRA) and DEC (OBJTDEC). It doesn't include FL, but that is specified in the SC settings for the Plate Solver. So, it would seem SC has all the info it needs for a plate solve with known FOV and initial RA/DEC.

However, the solve (using ASTAP) fails. The logs show that SC is starting a "blind solve", i.e. with no prior knowledge of position? And it seems to also not know the FOV (seems to select 1 degree). See attachment.

Is a plate-solve using the Folder Camera something that should work, or has that not made it onto your (long) to do list? :roll:

I checked everything by using Sky Simulator and the ASCOM Telescope simulator and also setup the simulator camera size to match. This worked well and solved every time.

So I returned to the Folder Camera, but kept the simulator mount. That way I could drive the (virtual) mount to the same coordinates as the Folder FITS file images. So it should 'know' some initial RA.DEC now. But that did not seem to help.

Cheers, Chris.
Attachments
plate-solve-folder-camera-1.txt
Log for Plate solve with folder camera FITS files
(5.03 KiB) Downloaded 37 times
Celestron EdgeHD 8, reducer 0.7x, Star Sense, CGX-L mount, Focuser, CPWI; Starlight Xpress AO, OAG and Filter Wheel; ZWO 294MC/294MM Pro and 174MM mini; SharpCap Pro, PHD2, Powermate 2x, Baader Neodymium, Astronomik CLS-CCD, ZWO UV/IR, Duoband filters.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 13177
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
Contact:

Re: Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#2

Post by admin »

Hi Chris,

I suspect that what is happening is that the folder monitor camera is not bothering to read the pixel size headers from the FITS files. Without a known pixel size, you can't work out the FOV even if SharpCap has the correct focal length set up, so the plate solving reverts to 'try all image sizes' mode. Actually, what happens here with Astap is that SharpCap runs Astap twice - first with options to say 'use the last measured FOV' and if that fails with options to say 'try a range of FOV'. If you have a mount connected then SharpCap will use the mount co-ordinates as a hint for the plate solving (even for a blind solve). However, I have noted that Astap's strength seems to be very fast results when the FOV and rough co-ordinates are known, as opposed to Astrometry.net based engines which seem to take longer but get the results in the end.

I will have to look at loading the pixel size - shouldn't be too hard and I think it will help. Obviously this requires FITS files to be loaded rather than PNG etc.

cheers,

Robin
ChrisR Oz
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:03 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#3

Post by ChrisR Oz »

Hi Robin,

The other thing about the Folder Camera that could change is mounting the additional Hardware. If the FITS file becomes the prime source of RA/DEC, pixel size and Focuser value, there is no real reason to (try to) mount any real hardware. Connecting to both Mount and Focuser could be skipped. I usually dismiss the errors for Mount and Focuser, when using the Folder Camera. For Plate-Solving, it would be a good idea to remove any ambiguity about where values for position, FOV or focus come from.

Cheers, Chris.
Celestron EdgeHD 8, reducer 0.7x, Star Sense, CGX-L mount, Focuser, CPWI; Starlight Xpress AO, OAG and Filter Wheel; ZWO 294MC/294MM Pro and 174MM mini; SharpCap Pro, PHD2, Powermate 2x, Baader Neodymium, Astronomik CLS-CCD, ZWO UV/IR, Duoband filters.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 13177
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
Contact:

Re: Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#4

Post by admin »

Hi Chris,

I have to be careful here, because one of the use cases is to pull in images from unsupported cameras that are being written to file as they are taken. In that case, you *are* running a live imaging session via the folder monitor camera, so connecting to hardare etc may be perfectly valid.

cheers,

Robin
ChrisR Oz
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:03 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#5

Post by ChrisR Oz »

Hi Robin,

Interesting. Then how would we “tell” SC that we want the position, focus, details to come from FITS header instead of from hardware? Would it be enough to just select “None” for mount and focuser hardware?

Chris.
Celestron EdgeHD 8, reducer 0.7x, Star Sense, CGX-L mount, Focuser, CPWI; Starlight Xpress AO, OAG and Filter Wheel; ZWO 294MC/294MM Pro and 174MM mini; SharpCap Pro, PHD2, Powermate 2x, Baader Neodymium, Astronomik CLS-CCD, ZWO UV/IR, Duoband filters.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 13177
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
Contact:

Re: Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#6

Post by admin »

Hi Chris,

I think the problem here is that this pushes the limits of what my idea for the folder monitor camera was - the two use cases I had in mind were

* the one I described above about monitoring a folder for newly created image files saved by some other application to support cameras that SharpCap doesn't normally support

and

* Reprocessing raw data captured either in SharpCap or another appication through live stacking

Neither of them really have a place for caring much about the co-ordinates or other header information in the fits files - with a couple of exceptions like exposure length.

I guess what I am saying, in a roundabout way, is that there isn't currently a way to do what you are asking, and I'm also struggling to see how it is something that is going to be widely used if it was available, sorry.

cheers,

Robin
ChrisR Oz
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:03 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#7

Post by ChrisR Oz »

OK, no worries. I understand that you’re juggling many different demands. And the use of the Folder Camera to handle unsupported cameras is a very important capacity.

I guess I’ll need to find other methods to explore why plate solve and sync works great many nights, and then fails completely at other times.

Cheers, Chris.
Celestron EdgeHD 8, reducer 0.7x, Star Sense, CGX-L mount, Focuser, CPWI; Starlight Xpress AO, OAG and Filter Wheel; ZWO 294MC/294MM Pro and 174MM mini; SharpCap Pro, PHD2, Powermate 2x, Baader Neodymium, Astronomik CLS-CCD, ZWO UV/IR, Duoband filters.
ChrisR Oz
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:03 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Plate Solve from Folder Camera?

#8

Post by ChrisR Oz »

Turning it around, the other approach is to make the "Plate solve (only)" menu tool more flexible. Perhaps make it pop-up a window, with all Plate Solve assumptions shown, where mostly we simply click on "Start". It's a bit like your "Start Capture" window that remembers what was done before.

But in the case of the Folder Camera, the assumptions shown could be edited (e.g. FL, FOV, RA/DEC, ...), or even add a button to retrieve RA/DEC and pixel size from FITS? At least we know what is passed to ASTAP, etc. That then narrows down the diagnosis to image quality issues.

Cheers, Chris.
Celestron EdgeHD 8, reducer 0.7x, Star Sense, CGX-L mount, Focuser, CPWI; Starlight Xpress AO, OAG and Filter Wheel; ZWO 294MC/294MM Pro and 174MM mini; SharpCap Pro, PHD2, Powermate 2x, Baader Neodymium, Astronomik CLS-CCD, ZWO UV/IR, Duoband filters.
Post Reply