ZWO ASI533 MC Pro - Optimum Exposure Time ?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:54 pm
Robin hi
May I ask you some more questions please regarding the ZWO ASI533MC Pro (Colour Astro Camera - Zero Amp Glow - Cooled Camera).
Back to the age old question of optimum exposure time, previously I had got to grips with ISO, but now moving on to Gain.
Attached Fig01 spec for ASI533 MC Pro.
So, I believe, I should always aim ideally for unity gain or greater, in this case 100 or 100>.
So am I correct in thinking, based on that, taking the 100 point on the bottom graph(info from also Fig02 for calculations),
my calculations should be:
For Gain 100. (1.5 log2 = 2.8)
20 X 2.8 x 2.8 /3.28 = 48 secs/exp
For Gain 350. (1.2 log2 = 2.3)
20 X 2.3 x 2.3 /3.28 = 32 secs/exp
Question 01
I should therefore aim for as many possibly exposures (if using Gain 100 ) of 48 secs and in theory, is it still correct to assume that :
60 x 48 sec/exposures are better than say 10 x 300 sec/exposure ?
Question 02
And may I pick your brains, Galaxies VS Nebula and exposure duration with gain.
Looking at the numbers above, strictly speaking, should I treat galaxies in the same way when taking pictures of Nebula & vice versa ?
Or do you find, cameras are more responsive for nebula with longer exposures or does that totally go against the above ?
Or is it just a case as in my example(if correct) Gain 350 is more sensitive, but 32 secs is optimal.
Therefore at Gain 350, 200 X 32 sec/exp should do nicely(or 20 x 5mins)!
_______________________________
Should we treat cooled astro cameras differently.
Hopefully thanks
Fig 01 Fig02
May I ask you some more questions please regarding the ZWO ASI533MC Pro (Colour Astro Camera - Zero Amp Glow - Cooled Camera).
Back to the age old question of optimum exposure time, previously I had got to grips with ISO, but now moving on to Gain.
Attached Fig01 spec for ASI533 MC Pro.
So, I believe, I should always aim ideally for unity gain or greater, in this case 100 or 100>.
So am I correct in thinking, based on that, taking the 100 point on the bottom graph(info from also Fig02 for calculations),
my calculations should be:
For Gain 100. (1.5 log2 = 2.8)
20 X 2.8 x 2.8 /3.28 = 48 secs/exp
For Gain 350. (1.2 log2 = 2.3)
20 X 2.3 x 2.3 /3.28 = 32 secs/exp
Question 01
I should therefore aim for as many possibly exposures (if using Gain 100 ) of 48 secs and in theory, is it still correct to assume that :
60 x 48 sec/exposures are better than say 10 x 300 sec/exposure ?
Question 02
And may I pick your brains, Galaxies VS Nebula and exposure duration with gain.
Looking at the numbers above, strictly speaking, should I treat galaxies in the same way when taking pictures of Nebula & vice versa ?
Or do you find, cameras are more responsive for nebula with longer exposures or does that totally go against the above ?
Or is it just a case as in my example(if correct) Gain 350 is more sensitive, but 32 secs is optimal.
Therefore at Gain 350, 200 X 32 sec/exp should do nicely(or 20 x 5mins)!
_______________________________
Should we treat cooled astro cameras differently.
Hopefully thanks
Fig 01 Fig02