stellar drift alignment... (for when you can't see polaris)

Got an idea for something that SharpCap should do? Share it here.
Forum rules
'+1' posts are welcome in this area of the forums to indicate your support for a particular feature suggestion. Suggestions that get the most +1's will be seriously considered for inclusion in future versions of SharpCap.
Post Reply
fjr1234
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2020 1:05 pm

stellar drift alignment... (for when you can't see polaris)

Post by fjr1234 »

Hello,
I'm sure I'm not alone in this; from my yard my view of Polaris is blocked. So I'd like to suggest adding a stellar drift alignment tool similar to the polar alignment one.

Thank's for your time.

Frank
calypsob
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:26 pm

Re: stellar drift alignment... (for when you can't see polaris)

Post by calypsob »

Ive been curious about polar alignment accuracy in this regard. I wonder how far away from polaris you can polar align via plate solve before a noticeable drop in performance occurs.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
Contact:

Re: stellar drift alignment... (for when you can't see polaris)

Post by admin »

Hi,

I haven't actually sat down and done the mathematics to work out how the accuracy would drop off with distance, but I suspect that if both the position of the celestial pole and the current centre of rotation was significantly out of view of the camera then the results would start to degrade. It would be like trying to measure the distance between two plants in your garden by triangulating from the other end of the street – you'll get some sort of answer but I wouldn't want to bet on it being an accurate one.

In practice, you hit other limitations first – any more than about 6 or 7° out from the pole and you can no longer ignore spherical geometry which would significantly complicate the calculations that need to be performed. The number of stars you need to have in your database also multiplies by a factor of four every time you double the distance you want to cover the pole. SharpCap currently has about 15 to 16,000 stars per hemisphere to cover the area out to 7° from the pole – if you try to go to 15° out then you would need around 60,000 stars in the catalogue.

I've tried at various times to put together routines that don't require review of the celestial pole and have never come up with anything that I'm satisfied with. My criteria for a satisfactory polar alignment routine are (at minimum) that it should require go to movements as any inaccuracy in those will lead to inaccuracy in the final results and also you should be able to adjust both axes at once rather than having to adjust them separately.

Cheers, Robin
Post Reply