% of pixels not stacked due to sigma limits

Discussions of Electronically Assisted Astronomy using the Live Stacking feature.
Post Reply
mAnKiNd
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:55 pm
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

% of pixels not stacked due to sigma limits

#1

Post by mAnKiNd »

What's a good % to aim for?

I always adjust my settings to achieve <0.1%, but would appreciate any input.

Thanks
Minos
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 13319
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:52 pm
Location: Vale of the White Horse, UK
Contact:

Re: % of pixels not stacked due to sigma limits

#2

Post by admin »

Hi,

In an average frame where there is nothing that needs to be cut out then the number should be small – probably a few tens to a few hundreds of pixels (maybe a few thousand on a very large resolution sensor). Think about the percentage of pixels that are being excluded in each frame – that should be significantly less than 1% under normal circumstances. Obviously the number should rise drastically in frames where there is a problem such as a satellite trail running across.

Hope this helps, Robin
mAnKiNd
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:55 pm
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Re: % of pixels not stacked due to sigma limits

#3

Post by mAnKiNd »

It does. Thanks.
Post Reply